The energy costs of the building industry
I was quite blown away by these stats — based on US figures — but no doubt quite similar here in Australia. About half the energy used in the US goes into constructing, heating, lighting and maintaining the nation's buildings.

That's taken from an article by the Rocky Mountain Institute's Greg Franta based on IEA data. Franta writes:
Just how important are buildings in the big scheme of things?
The built environment, with its broad diversity of sites and buildings, offers a huge opportunity to sustain a desirable quality of life on this planet. Buildings use most of our energy and deplete vast quantities of natural resources. They rely on non-sustainable material harvesting, extracting, and mining. And once built, they pollute water, earth, and air, and can harbor wholly unhealthy indoor environments.
On the contrary, "green" developments typically demonstrate sustainable practices of elegant design, offer responsible stewardship of the natural environment, and make wise investments.
Traditional sources of energy production and use are major culprits of atmospheric pollution. Buildings gobble close to 40 percent of the energy used annually in the United States to heat, cool, ventilate, light, and support other operations.1 This operational energy, plus the energy used to extract, harvest, and manufacture products, transport materials, and construct buildings means the building industry chews through more than half of all the energy used in the United States each year.
Integrated design leads to healthful and productive interiors, reduced operating costs, fewer environmental impacts, and restorative landscapes.
David Holmgren has mentioned that his family's passive solar house in Hepburn Springs, a showcase of sustainable architecture, would not be allowed to be built today because it does not meet the established environmental building code, which doesn't take into proper consideration thermal mass, or the embodied energy in the materials.
Still a lot can be done with elegant solutions which work with the elements and seasons rather than against them.
Greenhouse.gov.au has some good building and design tips.
Ceres have a retrofitted an old weatherboard house which you can check out on Saturdays in East Brunswick.
![]() |
![]() |
It has a small greenhouse attached on the north (sun facing) side which can be used to both heat and draw cool air through the house, depending on which vents are opened. The black rectangle on the right picture which looks like a door is a actually solar heat collector too. Deciduous trees close to the house provide shade in summer and let light through in the winter. The house also has working examples of a:
• Grid interactive PV power system
• Passive solar extension and additions
• Displays of insulation
• Energy efficient appliances
• Low embodied energy construction
• Natural floor coverings and finishes
• Urban rainwater harvesting
• Wattworks greywater system
• Solar hotwater & hydronic heating system
• Permaculture garden with low water tolerant plants
• And much more
An extra step for builders would be to consider natural local materials such as stawbale or cob. And if you think mud can't be stylish, check out the mud mosques of Mali…




Eric Praetzel said,
October 4, 2007 @ 5:44 am
I’m hesitant about believing numbers from Rocky Mountain.
Some of them are utterly out of wack with my reality.
For instance the payback on solar water systems. My family spends $70 Cdn/yr heating water for a family of 4. $20 of that is keeping the electric tank hot and the rest is heating water. Going to a solar water heating system would actualy have a payback of over 100 years – if we assumed an interest rate of 0%!
To be honest – if you conserve then it doesn’t pay to get solar water heating.
Dito in this region we have REEP – The Residential Energy Efficiency Project where they evaluate your house. Sadly – the measure things and then they use their “standard” house of your type. In our case that standard family/house like ours uses 4x the electricity, signif. more for heating. Even my neighbours uses 2x as much as electricity as we do – and they’re all well below “normal”.
We considered spending $5k in doing something “green” – something our neighbours could see – but there is nothing we can do for that price. Solar water heating is a total waste of money. Solar PV is in the same boat because it costs $2,500 extra for an interverter that can be grid inter-tied. So we’d need to spend more like $20k or $30k to make the cost of the inverter a small portion of the total system.
An electric car would be neat – but then if you’re only driving 10,000 km/yr it’s never worth buying a new car or spending a lot of money on an overhaul like putting in an electric motor and controller …
On the positive side I believe that it’s easy for people to reduce their electricity use. However, at work I’m responsible for at least 40x the energy use of my family. We have nothing but obsolete T12 fluorscent lights and hundreds of computers and nobody who cares about efficiency and policies which ensure that nothing will ever happen. Hell the lights in my office use as much energy as my family in our house!